Remove for Associate Members related to "letters of intent" and invitations initiated by the CABF

[dzacharo]

#32 (comment)

[clintwilson]

A proposed update:

Individuals or organizations interested in membership in the Forum or CWGs as an Associate Member may contact the Forum's Questions Mail list. The Forum may also extend an invitation to join the Forum or CWGs as an Associate Member when the CA/Browser Forum determines that maintaining such a relationship will be of benefit to the work of the Forum.
In order to become an Associate Member, an individual or organization must sign the Forum's IPR Policy Agreement. Under some circumstances this requirement may be waived, in writing, by the Forum based on overriding policies of the Associate Member's own organization IPR rules.
The Forum may also require a prospective Associate Member to sign a mutual letter of intent/understanding, or other similar agreement.

[dzacharo]

@clintwilson, I'm not sure we have addressed this issue in the last v2.5 Bylaws update. Can you please confirm that we still need to work on this issue in the next update?

[clintwilson]

@dzacharo I think it's still worth discussing this issue, especially in the context of the vague concerns raised with Princeton and the Cloud Security Alliance.