Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relying on a certificate/digital signature applied by the Applicant #244

Open
srdavidson opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
Future Version Future version of the S/MIME BR

Comments

@srdavidson
Copy link
Contributor

Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (b) of the S/MIME BR lays out the "Approved Framework" criteria to be considered by the SMCWG to allow a CA to rely upon a digital signature as evidence in vetting in Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (a).

https://github.com/cabforum/smime/blob/main/SBR.md#3241-attribute-collection-of-individual-identity

SMCWG should propose a specific certificate/signature scheme under the Approved Framework.

@srdavidson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is a draft proposal to add a Qualified Electronic Signature per EU Regulation (EU) 910/2014 (aka eIDAS) as an approved scheme under Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (a).

https://github.com/srdavidson/QES-SMIME-BR/blob/master/QES-proposal.md

@srdavidson srdavidson added the Future Version Future version of the S/MIME BR label Apr 22, 2024
@jochemvdberge
Copy link

jochemvdberge commented May 31, 2024

Wouldn't it be better to refer to the eIDAS update which has been published on April 30, so Regulation 2024/1183 and linking to https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401183? That isn't the full text (Regulation 2024/1183 amends 910/2014) but it might be better (like we also refer to updated RFCs).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Future Version Future version of the S/MIME BR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants