You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (b) of the S/MIME BR lays out the "Approved Framework" criteria to be considered by the SMCWG to allow a CA to rely upon a digital signature as evidence in vetting in Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (a).
Here is a draft proposal to add a Qualified Electronic Signature per EU Regulation (EU) 910/2014 (aka eIDAS) as an approved scheme under Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (a).
Wouldn't it be better to refer to the eIDAS update which has been published on April 30, so Regulation 2024/1183 and linking to https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401183? That isn't the full text (Regulation 2024/1183 amends 910/2014) but it might be better (like we also refer to updated RFCs).
Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (b) of the S/MIME BR lays out the "Approved Framework" criteria to be considered by the SMCWG to allow a CA to rely upon a digital signature as evidence in vetting in Section 3.2.4.1 (4) (a).
https://github.com/cabforum/smime/blob/main/SBR.md#3241-attribute-collection-of-individual-identity
SMCWG should propose a specific certificate/signature scheme under the Approved Framework.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: