Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make MyGet feed more discoverable #115

Closed
devlead opened this issue Nov 4, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

Make MyGet feed more discoverable #115

devlead opened this issue Nov 4, 2014 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@devlead
Copy link
Member

devlead commented Nov 4, 2014

Make "nightly" NuGet packages available in the MyGet gallery.

http://docs.myget.org/docs/reference/package-source-discovery
http://blog.myget.org/post/2013/03/18/Support-for-Package-Source-Discovery-draft.aspx

@patriksvensson
Copy link
Member

So what would need to be done here to make them available in the MyGet gallery? Read the links, but I might be a little bit stupid :)

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Nov 6, 2014

If you go here:

https://www.myget.org/gallery

and do a View Source, you will see that the MyGet Gallery is announcing, with the aid of the <link /> all the feeds that exist on MyGet. So, if you really wanted to, you could do:

Install-Package DiscoverPackageSources
Discover-PackageSources -Url "http://www.myget.org/gallery"

To add all the NuGet Feeds that MyGet hosts into your Visual Studio instance, not really something that I would recommend :-)

However, if you took the appropriate link and added it to your own website, let's call it http://www.cake.com, then people could do:

Install-Package DiscoverPackageSources
Discover-PackageSources -Url "http://www.cake.com"

And your MyGet Feed for cake would get added to Visual Studio.

HTH.

@patriksvensson
Copy link
Member

Ah, I understand :)
Thanks!

What would be a good discovery package source?

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Nov 6, 2014

I am not sure that you could add the <link /> to the second one, could you? That page is controlled by GitHub.

The first one is your page, which you could add the <link /> to, so I would go with that.

@patriksvensson
Copy link
Member

Yes, you're absolutely right :)

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Nov 6, 2014

👍

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Jul 19, 2016

Moving this to the website repository: cake-build/website#120

@gep13 gep13 closed this as completed Jul 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants