Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

dynamic instead of generic? #10

Open
ravensorb opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

dynamic instead of generic? #10

ravensorb opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels
Feature Up-for-grabs

Comments

@ravensorb
Copy link

Would it make more sense to use the "dynamic" data type rather than a generic? This would probably provide a lot more flexibility for working with json settings
@ravensorb ravensorb changed the title dynamic instead of generic/ dynamic instead of generic? Jun 16, 2016
@GeertvanHorrik
Copy link

This should be possible thanks to #8

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Jul 23, 2019

@ravensorb I am going to work on the premise that this is no longer required, as there wasn't an additional comment after @GeertvanHorrik mentioned that it should now be possible. Feel free to raise another issue if there is still an additional requirement.

@gep13 gep13 closed this as completed Jul 23, 2019
@ravensorb
Copy link
Author

A JObject is ok, however a dynamic is still easier to use and allows for more options within the script/code base.

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Jul 23, 2019

@ravensorb can you provide some examples of what you are trying to achieve? Happy to re-open if there is still a requirement.

@gep13 gep13 reopened this Jul 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature Up-for-grabs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@GeertvanHorrik @gep13 @ravensorb