Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
119 lines (97 loc) · 6.64 KB

TSC-2023-10-05-Meeting-Minutes.md

File metadata and controls

119 lines (97 loc) · 6.64 KB

Agenda and Minutes of CAMARA Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting - 2023-10-05

Invited TSC Participants

  • Herbert Damker - (Deutsche Telekom AG) Active Maintainer, TSC chair
  • Eric Murray - (Vodafone) Active Maintainer, TSC deputy chair
  • Ludovic Robert - (Orange) Active Maintainer, TSC deputy chair
  • Adnan Saleem - (Radisys) End User Council representative
  • Chris Howell - (Vonage) Active Maintainer
  • Diego González Martínez - (Telefónica) Active Maintainer
  • Doug Makishima - (Summit Tech) End User Council representative
  • George Glass - TM Forum representative
  • Henry Calvert - GSMA representative (partly)
  • Mark Cornall - GSMA representative (standin for Henry Calvert)
  • Jan Friman - (Ericsson) Active Maintainer
  • Jose Luis Urien - (Telefonica) Active Maintainer
  • Kevin Smith - (Vodafone) Active Maintainer
  • Mahesh Chapalamadugu - (Verizon) End User Council representative
  • Shilpa Padgaonkar - (Deutsche Telekom AG) Active Maintainer
  • Toshi (Toshiyasu) Wakayama - (KDDI) Active Maintainer

Guest Presenter:

  • Casey Cain (Linux Foundation)
  • Rebecca Zitha (MTN)

Further attendees (not complete):

  • Tanja De Groot (Nokia)
  • Hélène Vigue
  • Pierre Close
  • Dinesh Muthukumar
  • Fabrizio Moggio
  • Olta Vangjeli
  • Olu Omobitan
  • Foo Ming Hui

Minutes are available within: https://github.com/camaraproject/Governance/tree/main/documentation/MeetingMinutes/TSC

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Upcoming community tools for CAMARA (LF, Casey Cain)
  • Involvement of TSC members in Sub Projects
  • API Backlog
    • New proposals IMEI Fraud & Device Swap
    • Status of Site-to-cloud VPN proposal
  • Release Management (#82)
  • Commonalities Updates (not discussed)
  • Identity & Consent Updates (not discussed)
  • Backlog

Introduction

  • Check attendance (see above check marks)
  • Next TSC meeting October 19th, 16:00 CEST / 15:00 BST

Introduction by Linux Foundation about upcoming changes regarding project organization and tools (Casey Cain)

Linux Foundation (LF) are working at the request of the CAMARA governing board. Following services:

Involvement of TSC members in Sub Projects

API Backlog

New API Proposals

  • Device Swap (introduced by Rebecca Zitha - MTN)
    • Diego: In which WG this could be tackled ? Is it related to fraud like simswap or device status or new WG ?
    • Shilpa: we need to have categorization of APIs
    • Tanja: Name of the family right now is an API name not a family name
      • --> Mark Cornall: we need wider technical category (and not business /use case driven one)
      • --> Tanja: resource based categorization could be a sustainable way forward (e.g. Device Swap provides information about SIM)
    • Ludovic: Be aware of the impact of changing family name in our tools
      • Herbert will check with Markus
    • Ask to Rebecca to check if this API could be part of the sim swap family
      • --> Herbert alternative proposal: have a new family sim and check which API will fit in.
    • Jan raised that we need to think globally on this as this point about gathering API in a family will happen in future (webRTC & clic to dial for example)
      • Herbert to check also the consequences to move APIs between repositories
    • Eric raises the point that as of today SIM Swap sub-project has no minutes
      • [Post-meeting note: SIM Swap minutes are actually kept in a separate branch of the repository which can be found here]
    • Henry agrees that the families and categories should be proposed before the API request / proposal is submitted to CAMARA Backlog, should not be TSC work. CAMARA Form needs updating, GSMA will take this action
    • TSC outcome: No blocking for the API - but we need first to solve the family name to launch this API work - This family name issue must cleared for next TSC
      • Action to APIBacklog WG to nominate already the initial maintainers (so that the repo can be setup immediately after the decision about family name
  • IMEI Fraud (introduced by Rebecca Zitha - MTN)
    • New Family or put it Device Identifier family?
      • Eric explained that because the back end will be different it could be a distinct family than the device identifier API
      • Rebecca: it can fit into device identifier family
      • Diego: what is the input of the request?
        • Rebecca: IMEI
        • Diego: Ok but then how an operator can know as it is a cross operator topic?
    • TSC Outcome: API proposal accepted - This API will be worked out in the device identifier sub project - first request from the TSC to this sub project is to discuss the input parameter (IMEI but also other?)

Situation for Site-to-Cloud proposal

Not discussed.

Release Management (#82)

Backlog

AOB