Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confidence values #12

Closed
AlphaSquad opened this issue May 31, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Confidence values #12

AlphaSquad opened this issue May 31, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AlphaSquad
Copy link

It might be useful to have some kind of confidence values of the tools (if they provide it internally).
I have seen the following example for one of the (new) genomes:
The LCA of tools was bacteria (TaxID 2), which was caused by a single conflicting assignment:
Mash, Kaiju as well as Centrifuge all predicted a Psychrobacter, CheckM predicted bacteria, only dada2 predicted a Chryseobacterium which is of a different phylum than Psychrobacter. If the dada2 prediction is not really confident, one could decide to go with the matching prediction of the other 3.

@abremges
Copy link
Member

Can you provide me with the genome ID please, such that I can manually inspect the assignments?
I'm a bit surprised, because I already require a bootstrap support of 80/100 for Dada2 assignments.

@abremges
Copy link
Member

(Also, it's not LCA but the lowest consistent assignment.) 😛

@abremges abremges self-assigned this Jun 7, 2018
@abremges abremges added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2018
@abremges
Copy link
Member

abremges commented Mar 8, 2019

Not feasible to expose & individual tool assignments are available in the output folders.

@abremges abremges closed this as completed Mar 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants