You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It might be useful to have some kind of confidence values of the tools (if they provide it internally).
I have seen the following example for one of the (new) genomes:
The LCA of tools was bacteria (TaxID 2), which was caused by a single conflicting assignment:
Mash, Kaiju as well as Centrifuge all predicted a Psychrobacter, CheckM predicted bacteria, only dada2 predicted a Chryseobacterium which is of a different phylum than Psychrobacter. If the dada2 prediction is not really confident, one could decide to go with the matching prediction of the other 3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can you provide me with the genome ID please, such that I can manually inspect the assignments?
I'm a bit surprised, because I already require a bootstrap support of 80/100 for Dada2 assignments.
It might be useful to have some kind of confidence values of the tools (if they provide it internally).
I have seen the following example for one of the (new) genomes:
The LCA of tools was bacteria (TaxID 2), which was caused by a single conflicting assignment:
Mash, Kaiju as well as Centrifuge all predicted a Psychrobacter, CheckM predicted bacteria, only dada2 predicted a Chryseobacterium which is of a different phylum than Psychrobacter. If the dada2 prediction is not really confident, one could decide to go with the matching prediction of the other 3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: