Skip to content

Latest commit

聽

History

History
111 lines (61 loc) 路 3.73 KB

index.md

File metadata and controls

111 lines (61 loc) 路 3.73 KB
Raw

Domain-Driven Exception Handling

How do we apply Domain-Driven Design to exception handling?

I've been experimenting with some techniques and would love your feedback about this thread. 馃У

First of all, let's establish some goals: 馃憞

To define all the domain-specific exceptions, sealed unions come to hand.

Here's how we may generate Auth and Database exception types using Freezed:

Then we can define one global function that does two things:

  • run the Future<T> that is given as an argument inside a try/catch block
  • map all 3rd-party exceptions to our own exception types (and throw them)

Inside our repositories, we can wrap each Future-based API with the runCatchingExceptions() function.

As a result, if the code throws, it will throw any of our own exception types.

And when we implement the service classes in the application layer, we can:

  • run any business logic using our repositores
  • catch our exceptions
  • return (not throw) them using a Result type that can contain Error or Success

This is also a good place to log exceptions.

Nearly there!

If we use StateNotifier to control our widget's state, we can:

  • call the method in the service class
  • get the result and map it to an error/success state

And finally, in the widgets we can watch the state and listen for errors (I have already covered this before):

The end result?

  • we catch all exceptions from the outside world by wrapping all async repository methods with the runCatchingExceptions() function
  • the rest of our app only deals with exceptions that belong to the domain model
  • (optional) service classes will catch exceptions and return a Result<Error, Success> type
  • (optional) controller classes will use Result type and easily map any errors to user-facing messages

This encourages us to define every possible error state and show it in the UI.

One drawback of this approach is that we now rely on Freezed code generation to define sealed unions for all error types.

Depending on the project, code generation can be slow - though this can be somewhat mitigated:

So far, what I presented is a WIP and there are some things I want to figure out.

  • How to apply the same approach to Streams rather than Futures?
  • Should we map Stream<T> to Stream<Result<Error, T>> everywhere? Seems complicated in practice.

Another issue is that having more than one exception type (e.g. AuthException, DatabaseException) can make it hard to map errors across the different layers.

Maybe it would be best to define just ONE exception type with all possible errors (it's a sealed union after all).

There is so much to cover around app architecture, error handling, and domain-driven design.

And I've done my best to make it justice in my Flutter Foundations course:

Found this useful? Show some love and share the original tweet 馃檹

Previous Next
DDD: The Domain Model VSCode launch configurations