You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm having a really bad experience from starting charming with charmcraft.
The default charm created as part of a "charmcraft init" seems defaulted to a kubernetes charm, which means that for anyone like me - still working on machine charms - the produced charm is broken from start and needs to be heavily modified to get running.
Consider new charmers. They will be stuck from start and giving up here.
The produced charm from "charmcraft init" should NEVER fail as this destroys the experience from anyone trying to get started on juju.
Please create a charm that works from start regardless if you are working on a K8 or machine charm.
Since K8 charms and Machine charms are so different, it should be two different default charms created I guess. So, charmcraft init should really take that into consideration.
version used
charmcraft 1.0.0 403 latest/beta canonical✓ -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
description
I'm having a really bad experience from starting charming with charmcraft.
The default charm created as part of a "charmcraft init" seems defaulted to a kubernetes charm, which means that for anyone like me - still working on machine charms - the produced charm is broken from start and needs to be heavily modified to get running.
Consider new charmers. They will be stuck from start and giving up here.
The produced charm from "charmcraft init" should NEVER fail as this destroys the experience from anyone trying to get started on juju.
Please create a charm that works from start regardless if you are working on a K8 or machine charm.
Since K8 charms and Machine charms are so different, it should be two different default charms created I guess. So, charmcraft init should really take that into consideration.
version used
charmcraft 1.0.0 403 latest/beta canonical✓ -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: