Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need more happy path unit test coverage of cc_resizefs #3037

Open
ubuntu-server-builder opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Need more happy path unit test coverage of cc_resizefs #3037

ubuntu-server-builder opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working correctly launchpad Migrated from Launchpad

Comments

@ubuntu-server-builder
Copy link
Collaborator

This bug was originally filed in Launchpad as LP: #1726489

Launchpad details
affected_projects = []
assignee = None
assignee_name = None
date_closed = None
date_created = 2017-10-23T16:55:10.242414+00:00
date_fix_committed = None
date_fix_released = None
id = 1726489
importance = medium
is_complete = False
lp_url = https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1726489
milestone = 17.2
owner = chad.smith
owner_name = Chad Smith
private = False
status = triaged
submitter = chad.smith
submitter_name = Chad Smith
tags = []
duplicates = []

Launchpad user Chad Smith(chad.smith) wrote on 2017-10-23T16:55:10.242414+00:00

We need better unit test coverage of resizefs module to specifically catch minimally the full happy path run of cc_resizefs.handle() with and without kernel_commandline params which override root device path by UUID.

Was a problem for cloud-init 17.1 per regression bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1725067

@ubuntu-server-builder ubuntu-server-builder added bug Something isn't working correctly launchpad Migrated from Launchpad labels May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working correctly launchpad Migrated from Launchpad
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant