Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose retention tuning knobs #278

Closed
aieri opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #377
Closed

Expose retention tuning knobs #278

aieri opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #377

Comments

@aieri
Copy link

aieri commented May 29, 2023

Enhancement Proposal

Clouds come in various sizes, and customer requirements can vary wildly. If Loki is to become the default centralized logging solution for all charmed deployments I feel it would be important to allow operators to control their retention period and log storage consumption.

@simskij
Copy link
Member

simskij commented May 30, 2023

As mentioned in conversations elsewhere, size-based retention is currently not a thing in Loki. That addition to upstream is tracked here.

As for time-based retention, surfacing these would make sense, even thought it would be somewhat of a nightmare for the administrator to calculate with any confidence.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants