Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scim-for-keycloak plugin free version #111

Open
KalyaniBharatha opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

scim-for-keycloak plugin free version #111

KalyaniBharatha opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@KalyaniBharatha
Copy link

Hi,
it is showing less than 1000 users and less than 100 groups limit on users and groups for free license version, so is it for all actions or on bulk actions? i mean i cant create more than 1000 users by using this jar? or more than 1000 users in bulk request?

Thanks,
Kalyani

@KalyaniBharatha KalyaniBharatha changed the title scim-for-keycloak pligin free version scim-for-keycloak plugin free version May 6, 2024
@Captain-P-Goldfish
Copy link
Owner

there is no restriction in the source-code. It will just print warnings into the log-file if the plugin notices that these numbers are exceeded.

@KalyaniBharatha
Copy link
Author

okay, for free version, directly jar is providing, so is there any way for customizations?

@Captain-P-Goldfish
Copy link
Owner

the license model does not support customizations. But the plugin was developed in a way that customizations should also not be necessary assuming that there are not relevant bugs that prevent what you are trying to do.

Customizations are only allowed under the condition that I should cease support for the plugin (due to death or other unforeseen reasons). Therefore, the source-code is available to enterprise-customers to make sure that a possible backup plan can be mobilized if I am not able to support the plugin any longer.

@polarathene
Copy link

Since the README update deprecating the open-source plugin here was a direct commit and removed some useful context, it seems it might be relevant to this issue for any users checking out the repo.

The removed content better conveys the direction that was taken and how the enterprise offering differs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants