You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We handled imputers in our catalog and experiments for CARLA by removing these samples. Our datasets were, luckily big enough.
I think most of our recourse methods cannot handle missing data, such that imputers have to be dealt with before.
Thanks @Philoso-Fish , I actually handled them particularly at the Data object. As well exposing the 'fitted' methods for later usage, such getting counterfactuals for later inferences. It worked here but I'm still struggling to generalize it as an skeleton or something like that.
Thanks also for the reference. I'll follow it and growth a little bit, unfortunately not as much as our current real dataset / business problem. :-)
Btw, congratulations for CARLA initiative of benchmarking recourse methods.
What about imputers?
Do you have any recommendation or best practice for address them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: