Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Currently does not support XL and EXL containers #7

Open
JTtheGeek opened this issue Dec 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Currently does not support XL and EXL containers #7

JTtheGeek opened this issue Dec 27, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@JTtheGeek
Copy link

the newer containers aren't supported

@carmopereira
Copy link
Owner

newer containers? facepalm
did not ear about those

@JTtheGeek
Copy link
Author

xl and expanded xl, already updated the script to support
https://pastebin.pl/view/169cb49f

@Krell0
Copy link

Krell0 commented Jan 14, 2022

If you want to use container XL or XL extended then just put them under one of the containers you do not use like a XS. For example: CH_XS4_Coal the XS is not a extra small its really a XL or XL extended and you put under parameters that it can hold "X" Liters there you have it a XL or XL extended. Great you have that set up now, but it does not read right on the screen that is because under lines 332 to 352 its set up to look for 1,000,000 or less these need to be changed to just above what the max of what your container hub says you can hold. Example: I have 10 large containers connected to my container hub, with max putdown skills giving me a total of 1,920,000 Liters of ore that is able to be held in this container. So, I changed all the 1,000,000 under lines 332 to 352 to 2,000,000 and now the script is working and displaying just fine. if your using larger containers you may have to change yours to higher like 4,000,000 or 10,000,000 to make it work but that should do the trick for you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants