Unique namespace specification

[sagilio]

A improvement in #101.

Description

Casbin has many extensions and it will more in the future, To avoid chaos we can provide a unique namespace specification suggestion. It will like this :

Core Abstractions => Casbin

Sample:

• "IEnforcer" full type are Casbin.IEnforcer.
• "IModel" full type are Casbin.IModel

Core => Casbin.[Part Name]

Sample:

• "Assertion" full type is Casbin.Model.Assertion.
• "DefaultConfig" full type are Casbin.Config.DefaultConfig

Extensions Abstractions => Casbin.Persist

Sample: "IAdapter" full type is Casbin.Persist.IAdapter

Extensions => Casbin.[Extension Type Name].[Extension Name]

Sample: "EFCoreAdapter" full type are Casbin.Adapter.EFCore.EFCoreAdapter
Sample: "RaftDispatcher" full type are Casbin.Dispatcher.Raft.RaftDispatcher

Changes

Namespace changed (Breaking Changes):

• NetCasbin.X => Casbin.X
• Casbin.NET.Adapter.EFCore => Casbin.Adapter.EFCore

[hsluoyz]

sounds great to me!

[hsluoyz]

Fixed by: #121