New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Add a cask for Docker for Mac #20512
Conversation
You need to fill the PR template. It is not optional. |
homepage 'https://beta.docker.com/docs/mac/' | ||
license :gratis | ||
|
||
auto_updates false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is only to be used when the value is true.
Thank you for the contribution, but there are a lot of issues with it. Furthermore, since we can’t actually merge it right now, I’d rather not have PRs lingering indefinitely waiting for an external event beyond our control, particularly since details on the cask can change. It’s best to just work on the cask when it can actually be merged. |
As you wish, there are likely going to be lots of people who are looking for this, I figured it would make sense to have at least something in place as a PR so that effort wasn't duplicated. |
In the PR template there’s a section where you need to confirm you looked to make sure the cask wasn’t submitted before. |
Fair enough, I'll revisit when there is a final release and I can address all the points of feedback you raised. Thank you for your time. |
Maybe this can be added to https://github.com/caskroom/homebrew-versions in the meantime? |
@niksy I'm unlikely to contribute to cask again, feel free to use whatever code I started on in this PR. |
It is a shame that we cannot just |
@axelpale Not sure I understand. You can use |
@neverfox If that is true, great! The earlier replies in this issue left me the feeling that |
@axelpale No, but |
@neverfox Oh, good point. I guess pointing out this distinction will help others who come here for the info about the right installation command. Thanks! |
aaam ... still confused ... what will I get when I run a) Docker for Mac Regarding Cheers |
Currently:
Essentially, if you want the new native Docker for Mac implementation, you should go for That's my understanding at least 😅 |
@romatthe |
Thanks @romatthe , took me some time to figure this out. Even after reading this chain I am not sure why it cannot be called docker for mac |
Because the token reference must be followed to avoid duplicates, and “for mac” is redundant and nonsensical in most cases. Yes, some casks may get a bit harder to find, but that’s a more than acceptable tradeoff for a consistent rule that makes most of them better. |
This provides a cask for the new Docker for Mac that is currently in beta release. This is usable now for people with a beta token, but shouldn't be merged until stable versions are released.
Adding a new cask