Refactored DepCleanMojo

[ABHAY0O7]

• Removed unused import.
• Removed unused fields.
• Removed unused or never thrown Exception.
• Fix typos.
• Make searching faster while using configuration ignoredependencies.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@1d4ca64). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #85   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage          ?   6.07%           
  Complexity        ?      24           
========================================
  Files             ?      27           
  Lines             ?     955           
  Branches          ?     128           
========================================
  Hits              ?      58           
  Misses            ?     885           
  Partials          ?      12           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d4ca64...d05abb9. Read the comment docs.

[cesarsotovalero]

Hi @ABHAY0O7, thanks for this proposal.
Can you add some unit tests along with this PR?

[ABHAY0O7]

Hi @ABHAY0O7, thanks for this proposal.
Can you add some unit tests along with this PR?

Hi @cesarsotovalero
I was trying to add a unit test but I faced some problems that I mentioned here #86.
Please help me with this issue, so that I can continue my work.

[ABHAY0O7]

Hi @cesarsotovalero
I added an IT for depCleanMojo.
But I don't know how to pass these two failing checks.
Also, I am unable to understand the report generated by these two checks. 😅
So, can you please suggest to me, what can I do to pass these checks?

[cesarsotovalero]

Hi @cesarsotovalero
I added an IT for depCleanMojo.
But I don't know how to pass these two failing checks.
Also, I am unable to understand the report generated by these two checks. 😅
So, can you please suggest to me what can I do to pass these checks?

Hi @ABHAY0O7,
SonarCloud checks for potential bugs and code smells using static analysis. You can see the report here (notice that these metrics are mostly related to maintainability, so a PR will not be rejected because of not passing this gate). On the other hand, the Codecov report indicates how the PR affects the code coverage of the project, as measured by the unit tests. To not lower down the coverage, it is a good practice to always add unit tests on every PR that you make.

[ABHAY0O7]

Hey! @cesarsotovalero I have completed the work.
Now you can review the whole PR.

Thank you.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
2 Code Smells

0.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

[cesarsotovalero]

Hi @ABHAY0O7, LGTM. Notice that I fixed all the checks before merging. Thanks for your contribution, and keep going!