You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that while in the paper in Equation 5 during AP derivation, you add 1 both to the nominator and to the denominator following simply the formulation of AP.
But in this line of the code, you add 0.5 to the variable a and then estimate the precision by a/(a+b), which implies 0.5 is added to nominator and denominator. I understand all of your code and match with the paper, but I only could not see why you add 0.5 instead of 1 here. Am I missing something?
Thanks for your time
Kemal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In this code, the variable tmp1 contains f(x_{ii}) (f is the piecewise step function, i is the positive index), while in the Eq 5 of the paper, the summation is taken with j \neq i.
So the summation of tmp1 already has a 0.5=f(x_{ii}), just need to add another 0.5 to obtain 1.
Hi,
I noticed that while in the paper in Equation 5 during AP derivation, you add 1 both to the nominator and to the denominator following simply the formulation of AP.
But in this line of the code, you add 0.5 to the variable a and then estimate the precision by a/(a+b), which implies 0.5 is added to nominator and denominator. I understand all of your code and match with the paper, but I only could not see why you add 0.5 instead of 1 here. Am I missing something?
Thanks for your time
Kemal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: