Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FormatCBFMiniPilatus agrees to process but fails on Stoe lab-based data #628

Open
jamesrhester opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@jamesrhester
Copy link

jamesrhester commented May 2, 2023

FormatCBFMiniPilatus claims to understand data files from a Pilatus100K integrated into Stoe lab equipment but the frames are not able to be processed, because the miniCBFs do not have a Beam_xy entry, and even if they did, the detector is mounted on a 2 theta arm. A complete dataset is available here and a full imgCIF describing all scans and gonio/detector geometry is available here. A sample header from scan 2, frame 10:

###CBF: VERSION 1.5, XI2CBF v1.2 (25May2022) Stoe&Cie GmbH
_array_data.header_convention PILATUS_1.2
_array_data.header_contents
;
# Detector: Pilatus100K
# Pixel_size 1.720000e-04 m x 1.720000e-04 m
# Silicon sensor, thickness 1000.000000 m
# Exposure_time 60.000000 s
# Wavelength 0.560834 A
# Detector_distance 0.040000 m
# Start_angle 151.261000 deg.
# Angle_increment 1.000000 deg.
# Detector_2theta -23.400000 deg.
# Phi -5.000000 deg.
# Phi_increment 0.000000 deg.
# Chi -30.183000 deg.
# Omega 151.261000 deg.
# Omega_increment 1.000000 deg.
# Oscillation_axis OMEGA
;

I may find time to fix this, presumably by carving out an exception for the Stoe equipment and making a new class, but I'm raising it here so it is not forgotten.

@jamesrhester jamesrhester changed the title FormatCBFMini agrees to process but fails on Stoe lab-based data FormatCBFMiniPilatus agrees to process but fails on Stoe lab-based data May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant