We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As discussed earlier by @doutriaux1 @williams13 @painter1 there is a need to revisit cdscan as it's started to become difficult to maintain.
As noted in #124 additional to cdscan the psql package by Charlie O'Connor (https://github.com/UV-CDAT/uvcdat/tree/master/Packages/psql) may also be an approach to revisit when rethinking xmls.
@doutriaux1 @williams13 @painter1 - I think it's better to have a dedicated issue here, rather than tacking comments onto a bugfix issue for cdscan.
@doutriaux1 is 2.4 a likely milestone?
Migrated from: CDAT/cdat#1059
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dnadeau4
No branches or pull requests
As discussed earlier by @doutriaux1 @williams13 @painter1 there is a need to revisit cdscan as it's started to become difficult to maintain.
As noted in #124 additional to cdscan the psql package by Charlie O'Connor (https://github.com/UV-CDAT/uvcdat/tree/master/Packages/psql) may also be an approach to revisit when rethinking xmls.
@doutriaux1 @williams13 @painter1 - I think it's better to have a dedicated issue here, rather than tacking comments onto a bugfix issue for cdscan.
@doutriaux1 is 2.4 a likely milestone?
Migrated from: CDAT/cdat#1059
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: