Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

regarding low order elements (order<2) #43

Closed
sungho91 opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

regarding low order elements (order<2) #43

sungho91 opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@sungho91
Copy link

Hi all,

I have a quick question
Can we make Remhos work for low-order elements like (order<2)?

Best,

Sungho

@vladotomov
Copy link
Member

@sungho91 it's supposed to work with -o 1, and even probably with -o 0.

@vladotomov vladotomov self-assigned this Oct 2, 2023
@sungho91
Copy link
Author

sungho91 commented Oct 2, 2023

@vladotomov

Really? If I command line like this mpirun -np 8 remhos -m ./data/cube01_hex.mesh -p 10 -rs 1 -o 1, it does not work.
Also, I turned off the high-order solver by setting zero for the option and tried every option for the low-order solver, but it eventually was terminated.

@vladotomov
Copy link
Member

vladotomov commented Oct 4, 2023

@sungho91 you are correct, there are some inaccuracies in the setup.

Please try #45 (branch fix-order-less-2) and let me knows if it works.

@sungho91
Copy link
Author

sungho91 commented Oct 4, 2023

@vladotomov

I used mpirun -np 8 remhos -m ./data/cube01_hex.mesh -p 10 -rs 2 -o 1 -dt 0.02 -tf 0.8 -ho 1 -lo 1 -fct 2 -visit or mpirun -np 8 remhos -m ./data/cube01_hex.mesh -p 10 -rs 1 -o 2 -dt 0.02 -tf 0.8 -ho 1 -lo 1 -fct 2 -visit and got those result. They look similar so, I think it wroks correctly.

By the way, since Remhos has some options for choosing solvers, do we have the best options for running Remhos as a rule of thumb?

visit0001

visit0000

@vladotomov
Copy link
Member

vladotomov commented Oct 5, 2023

By the way, since Remhos has some options for choosing solvers, do we have the best options for running Remhos as a rule of thumb?

For orders up to three, with standard matrix-based assembly, I'd say the best (sharpest / most robust / most tested) option is
-ho 3 -lo 2 -fct 1

@sungho91
Copy link
Author

sungho91 commented Oct 5, 2023

@vladotomov thank you very much

@sungho91 sungho91 closed this as completed Oct 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants