You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we require a user to select which square sizes they want to sign over. This is a hostile UX, as the user must have extraneous knowledge on the data square, malleated transactions, and the non-interactive default rules to know which square sizes to sign over. For most cases, the user will likely want to sign all relevant square sizes.
as pointed out in #236, this does not mean that they have to sign over all square sizes
if a message can fit on a single row of square size x, then a valid commitment for square size x is valid for all square sizes >= x.
Also, they don't have to sign over square sizes that don't have enough shares to include their message + MsgPayForMessage transaction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we require a user to select which square sizes they want to sign over. This is a hostile UX, as the user must have extraneous knowledge on the data square, malleated transactions, and the non-interactive default rules to know which square sizes to sign over. For most cases, the user will likely want to sign all relevant square sizes.
as pointed out in #236, this does not mean that they have to sign over all square sizes
Also, they don't have to sign over square sizes that don't have enough shares to include their message +
MsgPayForMessage
transaction.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: