Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a more stable and actual URL for namespace of our EBML Schema #387

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

robUx4
Copy link
Contributor

@robUx4 robUx4 commented Jul 17, 2020

No description provided.

@robUx4 robUx4 added the bug label Jul 17, 2020
@robUx4 robUx4 requested review from mbunkus and dericed July 17, 2020 14:59
Copy link
Contributor

@mbunkus mbunkus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Steve, please see Richard's reply on the CELLAR ML regarding preference of a URN over URL, and if URL which one to use.

@dericed
Copy link
Contributor

dericed commented Jul 17, 2020

I suggest that we also include a declaration of the namespace in the narrative of the RFC, equivalent of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4826#section-3.4.4.

@dericed
Copy link
Contributor

dericed commented Jul 17, 2020

I also prefer urn:ietf:rfc:8794 as well, particularly after reviewing @mcr's comments.

@robUx4
Copy link
Contributor Author

robUx4 commented Jul 18, 2020

Closing this in favor of #388

@robUx4 robUx4 closed this Jul 18, 2020
@robUx4 robUx4 deleted the schema-namespace branch July 2, 2023 05:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants