Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suitability of sat-bundleadjust on Pleiades/PNeo images #17

Open
kaaviyave opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Suitability of sat-bundleadjust on Pleiades/PNeo images #17

kaaviyave opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@kaaviyave
Copy link

kaaviyave commented Aug 25, 2023

Hi team,

Thanks a lot for sharing your work and the paper!

I am working with multiple stereo-pairs from Pleiades and PNeo covering large areas in the order of 60 to 250+ sq kms in most cases.

For my preliminary tests, I am using 4 Pleiades images covering 190 sq kms (2 stereo-pairs acquired on 2 different dates).
I tried performing bundle adjustment using your packages (where I have tested so far the ba_bruteforce and ba_sequential modes).
The ba_bruteforce results in strange results whereas the ba_sequential mode succeeds to reduce the z-shift from 15m to 6m but the shift still remains quite significant.

I would like to understand if this could be due to my large study area and if the assumptions of single camera center would still hold in my use-case? If it wouldn't hold, would you be able to suggest some potential solutions/adaptations I could implement to improve the adjustment?

Thank you again for your time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant