ci: run versioned k8s jobs only on selected branches #4061
Conversation
By using a matrix strategy with excluding certain branches and Kubernetes versions, the number of CI jobs per PullRequest should stay limited. Closes: ceph#4060 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
nixpanic
added
ci/skip/e2e
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.25 |
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.26 |
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.27 |
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.28 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.25 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.26 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.27 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.28 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.25 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.26 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.28 |
|
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs |
|
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd |
|
This can only be tested once merged. The GitHub Workflow that is triggered when labelling comes from the default ( |
| issue-number: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} | ||
| body: | | ||
| /test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.27 | ||
| if: > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@nixpanic why do we need this if check here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We had the if statement already, so that it filters on the ok-to-test label and skips PRs that are closed. The check has been extended to filter on the target branch of the PR as well.
Each job has an if-statement like this, mostly for the check on the ok-to-test label.
By using a matrix strategy with excluding certain branches and Kubernetes versions, the number of CI jobs per PullRequest should stay limited.
Closes: #4060
Show available bot commands
These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:
/retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the<job-name>after unrelatedfailure (please report the failure too!)