-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix requesting a certificate for a wildcard and the base domain in our lexicon plugins #5673
Comments
I just want to confirm, today, if I use manual mode (I'm not on a DNS server with a supported plugin) and I request a base domain and its wildcard, certbot returns two TXT records with the same hostname. This causes validation to fail. The intent of this issue is to address that? And thus until 0.23.0, there's no way to get a wildcard and a base domain in a single cert using certbot? |
@seafoodbuffet You have to set both |
@mnordhoff Okay, then I suspect I'm making a mistake requesting this then... here's my most recent run
I had created both TXT records but it seems like it found the wrong and failed? |
@seafoodbuffet If both existed on the authoritative nameservers, it would have worked. That error means only one exists. Can you start a thread on https://community.letsencrypt.org/ with more information? 🙂 |
Okay, I wonder if I jumped the gun and tried to verify too soon whilst only one of those existed. I'll test again and if it still doesn't work, I'll start a thread. Thank you for double-checking that I'm not doing something obviously stupid. |
Given that AnalogJ/lexicon#182 closed and then reopened, but 2.2.0 has the used providers fixed (minus update_record which I don't believe is used), will certbot be waiting to integrate until all providers are tested and functional? |
I've triggered builds of all Lexicon based DNS plugins on Docker Hub so they'll use the new version of Lexicon. I've reached out to our package maintainers and will be filing bugs to get that updated there as well. To close this issue out we should modify |
@sydneyli, if you don't have time to get to this in the next couple days, let me know and I'll take it. |
@bmw Got started a little late, but I'll take a look at it today. |
Related to #5472. Blocked on AnalogJ/lexicon#182.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: