New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coap minimal #212
coap minimal #212
Conversation
FYI: PTAL means Please Take Another Look |
BTW, Urban dictionary offers another :-) |
* FOSSA functions | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
uint32_t ns_coap_send_message(struct ns_connection *nc, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a documentation extraction from comments.
It works if a comment is right before a function declaration.
I noticed that:
/* Options memory management functions */
void ns_coap_free_options(struct ns_coap_message *cm) {
Is meant to be a grouping comment but ended up being interpreted as a function comment.
Why not just add a short comment for all exported functions ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just add a short comment for all exported functions ?
Why not? I'll add. :)
LGTM, but why don't you develop in our main repo so that we get circleci tests ? |
I started this PR in my fork, so I decided to finish it there. |
Ok, you can run the same tests as the CI locally with: make -C test docker The unit test fails in C++ mode:
|
Another minor thing. Please follow our styleguide for git commit messages (refer to github styleguide)
|
Marko,
And finally - I promise, tomorrow I'll move to main repo. No more independent PR! PTAL |
Looks good! Merging |
Hi, @mmikulicic !
Please, review this PR.
Since this is my first protocol added to fossa, I'm not sure that I'm right in details.
Please, take a look. (aka PTAL)