Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[documentation] Shouldn't it be Pypeln instead of Pypeline? #25

Closed
leplatrem opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[documentation] Shouldn't it be Pypeln instead of Pypeline? #25

leplatrem opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@leplatrem
Copy link

In the docs we can read parts like «Pypeline is a simple yet powerful python library» or «A Pypeline pipeline»...

Wouldn't it better to use the name of the package everywhere? «*Pypeln is a simple yet powerful python library *» or «A Pypeln pipeline»...

Thanks for the awesome API!

Feel free to close if I'm completely muddled :)

@cgarciae
Copy link
Owner

Hey, yeah this makes sense. Originally I wanted to name it Pypeline but it was already taken on pypi, might as well use Pypeln everywhere to avoid confusion. I am going to revamp documentation soon so it will be good to fix this.

@cgarciae
Copy link
Owner

Done in 0.2.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants