Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oss-fuzz integration #207

Open
aschaich opened this issue Sep 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

oss-fuzz integration #207

aschaich opened this issue Sep 5, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@aschaich
Copy link

aschaich commented Sep 5, 2022

Hi all,

we have prepared the Initial Integration of cglib into Google OSS-Fuzz which will provide more security for your project.

Why do you need Fuzzing?
The Code Intelligence JVM fuzzer Jazzer has already found hundreds of bugs in open source projects including for example OpenJDK, Protobuf or jsoup. Fuzzing proved to be very effective having no false positives. It provides a crashing input which helps you to reproduce and debug any finding easily. The integration of your project into the OSS-Fuzz platform will enable continuous fuzzing of your project by Jazzer.

What do you need to do?
The integration requires the maintainer or one established project commiter to deal with the bug reports.

You need to create or provide one email address that is associated with a google account as per here. When a bug is found, you will receive an email that will provide you with access to ClusterFuzz, crash reports, code coverage reports and fuzzer statistics. More than 1 person can be included.

How Code Intelligence can support?
We will continue to add more fuzz targets to improve code coverage over time. Furthermore, we are permanently enhancing fuzzing technologies by developing new fuzzers and more bug detectors.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding fuzzing or the OSS-Fuzz integration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant