-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
imread methods shows different frame number compare with ImageJ #136
Comments
Do you mean the same result as Some TIFF readers (not sure about ImageJ) can only read 2^16 pages/frames. |
When I used this If I opened the same video in ImageJ, I found the number of frames is equal to 4541 frames. This is only happens for some of my files. |
Could be that the series metadata are wrong or parsed wrongly. Can you share a file or the output of |
In this case tifffile is using the OME metadata in the file, which obviously does not match the image data. This could be due to an interrupted acquisition. Try to use |
I'd like to read Tiff's video using
imread
techniques from your package, however, I received more frames than what I see in ImageJ. When I usetif = TiffFile('temp.tif')
and check the len, it gives me the same result (len(tif. pages)
). This occurs in only a few of the videos. Is there any particular explanation for this?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: