Skip to content

[proposal] Introduce custom logicalType #173

ievgenii-shepeliuk started this conversation in Ideas
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 1 comment 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@ievgenii-shepeliuk
Comment options

@ievgenii-shepeliuk
Comment options

@dstelljes
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Ideas
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #172 on January 20, 2022 13:06.