feat: try-runtime loop #4267
Merged
feat: try-runtime loop #4267
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martin-chainflip
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2023
msgmaxim
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2023
* chore: remove stale comment * feat: try-runtime command * feat: last N and all * doc: add doc for try_runtime_upgrade command * chore: linting * fix: use correct starting number * doc: fix the docs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
Part one of: PRO-956
Checklist
Please conduct a thorough self-review before opening the PR.
Summary
Provides an easy way to test migrations more thoroughly. This currently just uses
livewhich might be quite slow for non-localnets, but we can optimise this later to use snapshots. Being able to start a localnet run bouncer and then test the migration for all the blocks super simply is already quite powerful.Will also look at including something in CI.