Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Itemfilter hiding items instead of removing the rule. #49

Closed
benOesing opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Itemfilter hiding items instead of removing the rule. #49

benOesing opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@benOesing
Copy link

Hello,

the current behaviour hides items from the filter if they are not needed for the chaos recipe. For example:

Hide
HasInfluence None
Rarity Rare
Identified False
ItemLevel >= 60
Sockets <= 5
LinkedSockets <= 5
Class Body Armours

I suggest to instead remove those lines completely, so the default filter kicks back in.

Advantages:

  • Nobody misses rares that might be high value, but not needed for the chaos recipe.
  • When the user is done with the chaos recipe, he can just turn the options off and after the update the original filter is useable again.

Another quickfix would be to include the following lines to not lose on otherwise great items:

SynthesisedItem False
FracturedItem False
?AnyEnchantment False?

@profindi
Copy link

profindi commented Jan 11, 2021

that´s a very important issue. especially at league start . I want to see ALL Wands , but when you are finished with weapons it literally hides EVERY weapon. so i can´t use this tool for now, till it´s fixed.
Just get rid of the lines instead of hiding , so my loot filter works like i want it!
THX

@kosace
Copy link
Member

kosace commented Jan 14, 2021

i will change that soon. i try to update the tool before league start but cant promise that

@kosace
Copy link
Member

kosace commented Jan 19, 2021

Fixed in 1.1.5

@kosace kosace closed this as completed Jan 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants