Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ensemble calling issue #1515

Closed
parlar opened this issue Aug 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

ensemble calling issue #1515

parlar opened this issue Aug 15, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@parlar
Copy link

parlar commented Aug 15, 2016

Hi!

I found an issue with the ensemble calls. It turns out multiple rows may exist for the same variant but with calling differences. See below.

In the first row (entry), all callers find the variant in all samples, whereas in second row reports results for platypus only and the variant is not detected in the last sample.

Not sure what's going on here. And when I come to think about it, might it make more sense to include what callers detected a variant in the sample genotype fields?

chr12   2791132 .   A   G   82783.80    PASS    AC=8;AF=0.666667;AN=12;CALLERS=freebayes,gatk-haplotype,platypus,samtools;DECOMPOSED;LEN=1;NS=6;TYPE=snp    GT:AO:DP:GQ:PL:QA:QR:RO 1|1:1024,0:1024:99:34308,3083,0,34308,3083,34308:38141,0:0:0    0|1:593,1:1066:99:16784,0,12676,18171,14430,32628:22223,38:17655:471    1|1:696,0:698:99:23217,2063,0,23220,2095,23252:25851,0:38:1 0|1:355,0:729:99:9766,0,10310,10885,11379,22263:13290,0:13895:372   0|1:310,2:642:99:8399,0,9200,9327,10071,19454:11477,76:12368:329    0|1:5,295:596:99:8120,8856,17916,0,8919,8187:190,11007:11081:296
chr12   2791132 .   A   G   2947    PASS    AC=7;AF=0.583333;AN=12;CALLERS=platypus;DECOMPOSED;LEN=1;NS=6;TYPE=snp  GT:GOF:GQ:NR:NV:PL  1|1:1:99:1016:1016:2994,2994,0  0|1:1:99:1050:583:2997,0,3000   1|1:1:99:694:692:2994,2004,0    0|1:2:99:725:353:2997,0,3000    0|1:1:99:636:308:2997,0,3000    0|0:1:99:594:5:0,2997,3000
@chapmanb
Copy link
Member

Pär;
Sorry about the issue. Do the initial Platypus calls have two variant calls at this position? I'm trying to figure out if the ensemble method propagates an issue in the original calls or creates a new incompatible call as part of the merging process. If the later, then it would be helpful to have a minimal VCFs of the inputs in this region and we can try to debug further.

In general, the ensemble method is not smart, especially for multisample VCFs, so it's not going to be especially robust to any input issues. Trying to have a smarter ensemble method is something we'd like to do.

@lpantano
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @parlar

I am closing this, please feel free to open an issue if you find again the problem.

thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants