You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found an issue with the ensemble calls. It turns out multiple rows may exist for the same variant but with calling differences. See below.
In the first row (entry), all callers find the variant in all samples, whereas in second row reports results for platypus only and the variant is not detected in the last sample.
Not sure what's going on here. And when I come to think about it, might it make more sense to include what callers detected a variant in the sample genotype fields?
chr12 2791132 . A G 82783.80 PASS AC=8;AF=0.666667;AN=12;CALLERS=freebayes,gatk-haplotype,platypus,samtools;DECOMPOSED;LEN=1;NS=6;TYPE=snp GT:AO:DP:GQ:PL:QA:QR:RO 1|1:1024,0:1024:99:34308,3083,0,34308,3083,34308:38141,0:0:0 0|1:593,1:1066:99:16784,0,12676,18171,14430,32628:22223,38:17655:471 1|1:696,0:698:99:23217,2063,0,23220,2095,23252:25851,0:38:1 0|1:355,0:729:99:9766,0,10310,10885,11379,22263:13290,0:13895:372 0|1:310,2:642:99:8399,0,9200,9327,10071,19454:11477,76:12368:329 0|1:5,295:596:99:8120,8856,17916,0,8919,8187:190,11007:11081:296
chr12 2791132 . A G 2947 PASS AC=7;AF=0.583333;AN=12;CALLERS=platypus;DECOMPOSED;LEN=1;NS=6;TYPE=snp GT:GOF:GQ:NR:NV:PL 1|1:1:99:1016:1016:2994,2994,0 0|1:1:99:1050:583:2997,0,3000 1|1:1:99:694:692:2994,2004,0 0|1:2:99:725:353:2997,0,3000 0|1:1:99:636:308:2997,0,3000 0|0:1:99:594:5:0,2997,3000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pär;
Sorry about the issue. Do the initial Platypus calls have two variant calls at this position? I'm trying to figure out if the ensemble method propagates an issue in the original calls or creates a new incompatible call as part of the merging process. If the later, then it would be helpful to have a minimal VCFs of the inputs in this region and we can try to debug further.
In general, the ensemble method is not smart, especially for multisample VCFs, so it's not going to be especially robust to any input issues. Trying to have a smarter ensemble method is something we'd like to do.
Hi!
I found an issue with the ensemble calls. It turns out multiple rows may exist for the same variant but with calling differences. See below.
In the first row (entry), all callers find the variant in all samples, whereas in second row reports results for platypus only and the variant is not detected in the last sample.
Not sure what's going on here. And when I come to think about it, might it make more sense to include what callers detected a variant in the sample genotype fields?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: