Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Out-of-the-box Docker build can't find the config file #482

Closed
tetron opened this issue Jul 2, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Out-of-the-box Docker build can't find the config file #482

tetron opened this issue Jul 2, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@tetron
Copy link
Contributor

tetron commented Jul 2, 2014

crunch@97452befd42c:/tmp/crunch-job/project1/work$ bcbio_nextgen.py ../config/project1.yaml
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/bcbio_nextgen.py", line 62, in
main(**kwargs)
File "/usr/local/bin/bcbio_nextgen.py", line 40, in main
run_main(**kwargs)
File "/usr/local/share/bcbio-nextgen/anaconda/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bcbio/pipeline/main.py", line 31, in run_main
config, config_file = load_system_config(config_file, workdir)
File "/usr/local/share/bcbio-nextgen/anaconda/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bcbio/pipeline/config_utils.py", line 60, in load_system_config
(config_file, os.path.join(base_dir, "galaxy")))
ValueError: Could not find input system configuration file bcbio_system.yaml, including inside standard directory /usr/local/share/bcbio-nextgen/galaxy

@chapmanb
Copy link
Member

chapmanb commented Jul 3, 2014

Peter;
There is a wrapper around docker called bcbio-nextgen-vm which is meant to run against the docker images:

https://github.com/chapmanb/bcbio-nextgen-vm

It keeps bcbio_system.yaml outside of the container allowing it to be edited by users, since it relates to the external system. The general idea behind the bcbio-nextgen-vm wrapper is to keep data, workflow and parallelization outside the container. All of the tools and biological logic in bcbio-nextgen is inside the container. I'd hope the bcbio-nextgen-vm wrapper is where we could abstract Arvados integration.

Let me know if this works or if better organization would make more sense. Thanks much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants