Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

charmrun examples should use ++n instead of +p #2947

Open
jcphill opened this issue Jul 13, 2020 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3780
Open

charmrun examples should use ++n instead of +p #2947

jcphill opened this issue Jul 13, 2020 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3780

Comments

@jcphill
Copy link
Collaborator

jcphill commented Jul 13, 2020

The example charmrun command lines at https://charm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/charm++/manual.html#running-charm-programs still use the old +p style even though ++n is now recommended. Given that most users scan for the examples rather than reading through all of the text, the charmrun examples (especially the smp examples) should all use ++n.

Also, the final paragraph in the SMP Options section discusses the +p option without mentioning the ++n option. The ++n option should be prominently and frequently discussed in the SMP Options section, in particular reminding people about it when the ++ppn option is introduced.

@hizv hizv linked a pull request Feb 14, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant