Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CW-2015] Add a time type between one message and other in macros #7249

Open
alissondelfino opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
feature-request This label is used to track new features which is a significant change to existing product linear Low priority Created by Linear-GitHub Sync

Comments

@alissondelfino
Copy link

alissondelfino commented Jun 3, 2023

Is your feature or enhancement related to a problem? Please describe.

When using a macro with several images and songs sending to whatsapp the messages arrived on client device out of order.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add a type of resource TIME would solve this issue. As between one message and another the system would wait for a predefined time to send the next sentence of a macro.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

CW-2015

@alissondelfino alissondelfino added the feature-request This label is used to track new features which is a significant change to existing product label Jun 3, 2023
@pranavrajs pranavrajs changed the title Add a time type between one message and other in macros [CW-2015] Add a time type between one message and other in macros Jun 5, 2023
@pranavrajs
Copy link
Member

@alissondelfino Can you please add a screencast of the behaviour?

@pranavrajs pranavrajs added the Low priority Created by Linear-GitHub Sync label Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request This label is used to track new features which is a significant change to existing product linear Low priority Created by Linear-GitHub Sync
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants