Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ARM architecture #7470

Open
hexclann opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 11 comments
Open

Support ARM architecture #7470

hexclann opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 11 comments
Labels
🏋️‍♂️ accepting-community-prs feature-request This label is used to track new features which is a significant change to existing product 🐳 self-hosted/docker Issues related to docker installations

Comments

@hexclann
Copy link

hexclann commented Jul 6, 2023

Is your feature or enhancement related to a problem? Please describe.

Is your enhancement request related to a problem? Please describe.
The current public container images for chatwoot do not work on ARM64 servers.

Describe the solution you'd like

Provide multi-architecture images so that chatwoot can be run on ARM64 servers.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@hexclann hexclann added the feature-request This label is used to track new features which is a significant change to existing product label Jul 6, 2023
@Startouf
Copy link

Related to #2575 but I see you have already posted there

@microtec1989
Copy link

It would be good if Chatwood ran on arm64 machines as there are many possibilities for implementation and development on these machines currently. I already have several apps running on these machines, now it's chatwoot's turn

@iamkhalidbashir
Copy link

I have created an arm64 repo for chatwoot, which can be used untill officially supported by chatwoot-team
https://hub.docker.com/r/amoxt/chatwoot-arm

Note: I will try to build for latest versions, if I miss any, please reply me with this comment.

Best,
Khalid

@hexclann
Copy link
Author

@pranavrajs can we please have an official support?

@liefra
Copy link

liefra commented Jan 3, 2024

@iamkhalidbashir : Could you please release a v3.4.0. thank you

@iamkhalidbashir
Copy link

@iamkhalidbashir : Could you please release a v3.4.0. thank you

v3.4.0 is live for arm64. Enjoy!

@4rielmendes
Copy link

@iamkhalidbashir : Could you please release a v3.4.0. thank you

v3.4.0 is live for arm64. Enjoy!

In this version for arm we are unable to change logos, names, etc. Can this version be turned into a white label?

@iamkhalidbashir
Copy link

@iamkhalidbashir : Could you please release a v3.4.0. thank you

v3.4.0 is live for arm64. Enjoy!

In this version for arm we are unable to change logos, names, etc. Can this version be turned into a white label?

I'm not sure that's the case. I deployed directly from this repo it should have option to change logos and names

@4rielmendes
Copy link

4rielmendes commented Jan 29, 2024 via email

@jquerubim10
Copy link

@iamkhalidbashir : Could you please release a v3.5.2. thank you

@robsoncombr
Copy link

@iamkhalidbashir could you please show me how to achieve it? I have ARM64 hardware but I never built it with success. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏋️‍♂️ accepting-community-prs feature-request This label is used to track new features which is a significant change to existing product 🐳 self-hosted/docker Issues related to docker installations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants