Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document output and/or expected results #210

Closed
aw-was-here opened this issue Nov 3, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

document output and/or expected results #210

aw-was-here opened this issue Nov 3, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
Type: Enhancement Improves an existing feature
Milestone

Comments

@aw-was-here
Copy link

All of the inspec exec examples provide no hints as to what the expected outcome should be. For those who don't come from a Ruby universe, this is particularly confusing. Is it just a pass/fail as a return value? Is it JSON? Is it unformatted text? Is it rspec? Is it TAP?

It seems extremely realistic that someone would want to hook this up to, say, Jenkins. But with the lack of documentation on the consumer output, many will just take a pass and move on to something else.

@chris-rock
Copy link
Contributor

@aw-altiscale That is a great point. Thanks for reporting. Could you share your specific use case? I would be very interested in your expectation of the output.

I see different use cases that we need to cover in-depth:

  • cli output
  • json output (e.g. for jenkins)

Is there anything else I missed?

@chris-rock chris-rock added the Type: Enhancement Improves an existing feature label Dec 11, 2015
@arlimus arlimus added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Mar 10, 2016
@chris-rock
Copy link
Contributor

A lot has improved with #671 Please reopen, if InSpec is still not delivering all information you require.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 11, 2016

Is this going to be added to https://docs.chef.io/ctl_inspec.html ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Enhancement Improves an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants