You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially the family does not reflect the power inspec offers with methods like os.linux? or os.redhat?. Therefore I propose to return an array for family. This returns all tags for an operating system like
Users are confused by the json output that may return null.
We should have a json and human-readable output analog to the --format for exec (maybe even reuse those formatters), as highlight in a previous iteration of this issue by @arlimus
A human-readable output may look like
Operating System: Windows
Release: 2012 R2
Arch: X68
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could enrich the
inspec detect
command with more valuable information. Currently we recieve the following output:Especially the
family
does not reflect the power inspec offers with methods likeos.linux?
oros.redhat?
. Therefore I propose to return an array for family. This returns all tags for an operating system likeWe also should think about:
null
.--format
for exec (maybe even reuse those formatters), as highlight in a previous iteration of this issue by @arlimusA human-readable output may look like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: