Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auditd_rules rework #400

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 9, 2016
Merged

auditd_rules rework #400

merged 14 commits into from
Feb 9, 2016

Conversation

srenatus
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #312 and #309, without dropping support for the old syntax. (Also documents the old status method.)

The new features, however, you only get with an not-outdated version of the audit package.

Adds a utility class for chaining filter methods that could be useful in more places, I hope.

Note that I couldn't find a way to have MockLoader present the outdated format, so I've just dropped that test for now.

it { should cmp 0 }
end

**Query properties of rules targetting specific syscalls or files.**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

targeting typo

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, fixed

@arlimus
Copy link
Contributor

arlimus commented Feb 8, 2016

this turned out to be an awesome improvement!! :)
rebased, just one more feedback from @srenatus on that last commit for semantics

@arlimus
Copy link
Contributor

arlimus commented Feb 9, 2016

👍

@arlimus
Copy link
Contributor

arlimus commented Feb 9, 2016

blocked by unit tests failing after winrm update: #439

arlimus added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2016
@arlimus arlimus merged commit 2cf3b7e into master Feb 9, 2016
@arlimus arlimus deleted the sr/auditd_rules-rework branch February 9, 2016 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Enhancement Improves an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants