Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade FFI to Ruby 2.3 issues on windows #980

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2016
Merged

Upgrade FFI to Ruby 2.3 issues on windows #980

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2016

Conversation

ksubrama
Copy link

No description provided.

@ksubrama
Copy link
Author

ksubrama commented Aug 25, 2016

@chris-rock
/cc @jkeiser : If you run into other weird loading errors on Windows when bumping to ruby 2.3, it's because of FFI incompatibility:

C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/ffi-1.9.10-x86-mingw32/lib/ffi.rb:6:in `require': cannot load such file -- ffi_c (Loa
dError)
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/ffi-1.9.10-x86-mingw32/lib/ffi.rb:6:in `rescue in <top (required)>'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/ffi-1.9.10-x86-mingw32/lib/ffi.rb:3:in `<top (required)>'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/win32-process-0.8.3/lib/win32/process/functions.rb:6:in `require'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/win32-process-0.8.3/lib/win32/process/functions.rb:6:in `<top (required)
>'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/win32-process-0.8.3/lib/win32/process.rb:1:in `require_relative'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/win32-process-0.8.3/lib/win32/process.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/mixlib-shellout-2.2.7-universal-mingw32/lib/mixlib/shellout/windows.rb:2
1:in `require'
        from C:/Ruby23/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/mixlib-shellout-2.2.7-universal-mingw32/lib/mixlib/shellout/windows.rb:2
1:in `<top (required)>'```

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants