Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Persistence mechanism is broken #10

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 16, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Persistence mechanism is broken #10

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 16, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install NoSleep
2. Look at the current status - remember it
3. Reboot computer
4. Check the status and confirm that it same as before reboot
5. Change status and perform reboot again
6. Look the status - it is the same as in point 2. <<< This is erroneous 
behavior

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Activation status should be the same as before reboot.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by integral...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2011 at 9:13

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 3 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2011 at 9:17

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 8 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2011 at 9:17

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 7 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2011 at 9:18

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2011 at 9:23

  • Changed title: Persistence mechanism is broken

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Yes, this issue is important to me. It would be very nice if fixed :)

Original comment by bsprec...@gmail.com on 15 Dec 2011 at 2:43

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 16 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 15 Feb 2012 at 7:57

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Fix will be introduced in version 1.3

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 17 Feb 2012 at 5:35

  • Changed state: Fixed

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 18 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by integral...@gmail.com on 18 Feb 2012 at 7:17

This was referenced Jan 16, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant