Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #24 – should we use Boolean for the preference or just a controlled vocabulary? #24

Closed
stephenhart8 opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@stephenhart8
Copy link
Collaborator

Some instances, like appellations, have a E55_Type to specify if an appellation is the one preferred by the institution or not. This type is therefore binary, either yes, it is a preferred appellation, or no, it is a non-preferred appellation.

There is two way to tackle this:

  1. to use a Boolean variable (like yes or no);
  2. to use controlled vocabulary (AAT or other).

What should we use? Could we use both?

@Habennin
Copy link

Use aat type. The Yes No means nothing in linked data

@stephenhart8
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I will close this issue unless someone wants to add something.

@illip
Copy link
Collaborator

illip commented Nov 15, 2019

I agree with @Habennin, It's always a better idea to use URIs to foster interoperability. Also, we don't know the future and we might need a third option in certain cases.

+1 for controlled vocabularies

@stephenhart8
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In accordance with everyone, we will use Controlled Vocabularies, instead of booleans.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants