Executing cuninst without parameters shouldn't do anything

[michfield]

Executing cuninst without parameters shouldn't do anything,
besides help, usage example or similar stuff.

And it's really trying to uninstall something...

Looks like it want's to uninstall Chocolatey itself - good think it didn't succeed :)

If it's intended behaviour to uninstall itself, it's a big problem.
Why don't you introduce something like: cuninst myself or similar

[ferventcoder]

Well this is a problem. Expected behavior is help or noop.

On Tuesday, April 9, 2013, michfield wrote:

Executing cuninst without parameters shouldn't do anything,
besides help, usage example or similar stuff.

And it's really trying to uninstall something...

Looks like it want's to uninstall Chocolatey itself - good think it didn't
succeed :)

If it's intended behaviour to uninstall itself, it's a big problem.
Why don't you introduce something like: cuninst myself or similar

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/265
.

---

Rob
"Be passionate in all you do"

http://devlicio.us/blogs/rob_reynolds
http://ferventcoder.com
http://twitter.com/ferventcoder

[rismoney]

added to the TODO...

me: Dr. it hurts when I do foo
Dr: stop doing foo

[gep13]

To try to help out, I have added a pull request to try to cover this issue. Not sure if it covers everything that would be required, but it does add a Unit Test to cover this scenario. Would be interested to hear thoughts on what I have suggested. Thanks!

[ferventcoder]

This is closed since the PR was accepted.