-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doesn't TopologyProposal need old_topology as well? #22
Comments
If we have n_old_atoms = old_system.getNumParticles()
unique_old_atoms = [atom for atom in range(n_old_atoms) if atom not in new_to_old_atom_map.values()] |
Hm. OK. I think it would be useful to have convenient access to all the bits of information through
etc. Maybe we can make Would still maybe be useful to have the old topology in case we need to write PDB files of these transformations for debugging. |
I do generally agree that we should promote |
There is a test that is failing because |
Ok... looking into this. I thought I had removed that dependency previously. |
Ok, these are the import problems I was talking about. I don't think the There are also some API issues. I'm going to open a PR and promote the |
Ah. Let me fix that. |
Oh! Sorry about that! |
Addressed by #27 |
Otherwise how will we figure out the old atoms that don't appear in the new molecule?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: