-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Grammatical suggestions for the paper #20
Comments
There are also a few missing doi's in the references
|
Closed
36 tasks
Thanks @lheagy - will get back with changes this weekend. |
All changes have been made and committed to the master branch @lheagy |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Just a couple grammatical suggestions for the paper in
openjournals/joss-reviews#1221. Please adopt what you think fits and leave those that don't.
Introduction
This statement is fairly long, and it isn't entirely clear to me what the "are less accessible" is referring to. Would you mind trying to clarify this?
"like" is fairly informal for academic writing. Does "such as" or similar work?
Should be "varies" (or "estimation processes vary")
The grammar is a bit off here. How about: "for example, a census tract with a large park or a neighborhood that has a significant commercial area alongside residential housing would violate this assumption."
The areal R package
I think this can be lightly re-worded to be more clear: e.g.
"We also aim to provide additional functionality that is not currently available in existing approaches found in the
sf
package [@pebesma2018simple], for example thest_interpolate_aw()
function, while providing support for modern data management (e.g. tidyverse) and spatial data (e.g. sf) frameworks.""frictionless" (no dash is needed)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: