Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: all plug-ins be closed #17

Closed
1 task done
chenxin0397 opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed
1 task done

Feature Request: all plug-ins be closed #17

chenxin0397 opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 10 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@chenxin0397
Copy link

Feature Requested

After the update, all plug-ins cannot be closed uniformly, and it becomes complicated to achieve this effect

Relevant Screenshot

No response

Checklist

  • The feature would be useful to more users than just me.
@chenxin0397 chenxin0397 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 15, 2022
@nhan000
Copy link

nhan000 commented Nov 16, 2022

Many new features are great but it's weird to see why the "disable all Plug-ins" function was taken away

@geoffreysflaminglasersword
Copy link
Collaborator

Feature Requested

After the update, all plug-ins cannot be closed uniformly, and it becomes complicated to achieve this effect

Relevant Screenshot

No response

Checklist

  • The feature would be useful to more users than just me.

You'll have to clarify what you mean by "closed uniformly"

Many new features are great but it's weird to see why the "disable all Plug-ins" function was taken away

Assuming that's also what the first comment was about, you can do that by disabling community plugins (entering "safe mode"), so I don't see the need for it.

If for some reason you desperately need safe mode disabled and all plugins disabled, either feel free to add it yourself, or you can do that pretty easily by clicking bisect a few times, then manually disabling the last plugin.

I have over 150 plugins and 7 bisections is the same as disabling all. In my mind that's pretty simple and makes it not worth cluttering things with another command.

@geoffreysflaminglasersword geoffreysflaminglasersword closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 17, 2022
@chenxin0397
Copy link
Author

Please tell me, what plugin can I use to disable all plugins, I just need this one function

@chenxin0397
Copy link
Author

Feature Requested

After the update, all plug-ins cannot be closed uniformly, and it becomes complicated to achieve this effect

Relevant Screenshot

No response

Checklist

  • The feature would be useful to more users than just me.

You'll have to clarify what you mean by "closed uniformly"

Many new features are great but it's weird to see why the "disable all Plug-ins" function was taken away

Assuming that's also what the first comment was about, you can do that by disabling community plugins (entering "safe mode"), so I don't see the need for it.

If for some reason you desperately need safe mode disabled and all plugins disabled, either feel free to add it yourself, or you can do that pretty easily by clicking bisect a few times, then manually disabling the last plugin.

I have over 150 plugins and 7 bisections is the same as disabling all. In my mind that's pretty simple and makes it not worth cluttering things with another command.

Please tell me, what plugin can I use to disable all plugins, I just need this one function

@nhan000
Copy link

nhan000 commented Nov 17, 2022

disabling community plugins (entering "safe mode")

thank you @geoffreysflaminglasersword! That didn't come to my mind. I guess I was used to being able to disable all plugins using the command from the command panel instead of going into the settings.

@geoffreysflaminglasersword
Copy link
Collaborator

What is your use case?

@chenxin0397
Copy link
Author

What is your use case?

I set up some manifests to manage my plugin startup differently. But when new plugins are added, plugins that are manually turned on or off are not called by manifests. So I need to close and then use the plug-in list, and start the part of the plug-in I want to start according to my needs

@geoffreysflaminglasersword
Copy link
Collaborator

What is your use case?

I set up some manifests to manage my plugin startup differently. But when new plugins are added, plugins that are manually turned on or off are not called by manifests. So I need to close and then use the plug-in list, and start the part of the plug-in I want to start according to my needs

I'm not quite understanding, but that sounds very specific to you. Again, feel free to make a pull request, but it sounds like you'd just as well make calls directly to obsidian from whatever startup process you've set up rather than relying on a third party plugin.

@chenxin0397
Copy link
Author

What is your use case?

I set up some manifests to manage my plugin startup differently. But when new plugins are added, plugins that are manually turned on or off are not called by manifests. So I need to close and then use the plug-in list, and start the part of the plug-in I want to start according to my needs

I'm not quite understanding, but that sounds very specific to you. Again, feel free to make a pull request, but it sounds like you'd just as well make calls directly to obsidian from whatever startup process you've set up rather than relying on a third party plugin.

Because too many plug-ins opened will affect the speed of starting OB, so I used the method in the following URL.
https://tfthacker.medium.com/improve-obsidian-startup-time-on-older-devices-with-the-faststart-script-70a6c590309f

Even so, some plug-ins will still be turned on manually. If you don’t remember to turn them off, it will affect the turn-on time at the next startup

@chenxin0397
Copy link
Author

Or, it can be like this, please separate the plug-in functions of the old version, as long as the functions of version 0.4.0 can be kept and not automatically updated to 1.0.0, my needs can also be met.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants