New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bi-directional-Sync works but if wp-post created first, no civi-contact are created #24
Comments
@jbonlinea Do you have a CiviCRM Multi-Domain install? |
Hi, |
As the docs suggest, you've got yourself a very complicated system that will almost certainly require custom code.
Returning to this, then, I honestly don't know why this is the case for you. Works for me on a test Multisite (and Multi-Network) with a similar configuration. 🤷 |
ok ok... Sometimes men need a kick in the ass, but sometimes it is the machine that really needs it :D As said, I "added" this plug-in to a wp site that already had a bunch a post of a given post type. What I did thus is : it didn't work as explaiend above, thus I re-mapped the post-type, turn all plug-in off and on again, then only the mandatory plug-in for this feature... no luck And I just have re-saved the acf group, and boom it works so kick your machine not only where it deserve, but everywhere else you may think of ;) Edit : this is for @christianwach 🥇 plugin 💯 |
Hi there
I've set up this plug on on a site that already had cpt, but no civi untill now, and have one case where civi-contact creation do not occurs
In my case I intend to sync Wp-User <=> Civi-Contact <=> Wp-Post
if I create a Wp-user :
if I create a Civi-Contact :
if I create a Wp-Post,
if I edit a user/contact.post :
I can't explain why it comes from ? I've enable wp-debug, but nothing pops
Do you have any ideas where could I look to fing a clue and fix this ?
thank's in advance
Note that's I'm on a wp multisite
Here are my "versions"
wp 5.8.1
civi 5.41 : active on site by site basis
civicrm-wp-profle-sync : latest commit, active on site by site basis
civicrm admin utilities : latest commit, active network wide
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: