You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It’s not shown in this example, but I have observed, that when the coverage values are replaced with the wrong "relative abundance" values, they seem to be used for coverage filtering, which can result in loosing valid iRep values.
Thanks!
Bela
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
I noticed, that when iRep_filter.py is run twice (e.g., first collating genomes, then samples), the coverage information gets lost.
Here is a minimal example:
input: a.txt b.txt
when i run
iRep_filter.py -t a.txt b.txt > ab.txt
it results in ab.txtNotice how these sections are suddenly identical
It’s not shown in this example, but I have observed, that when the coverage values are replaced with the wrong "relative abundance" values, they seem to be used for coverage filtering, which can result in loosing valid iRep values.
Thanks!
Bela
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: