Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

daemon: fix spelling in ipam-multi-pool-pre-allocation flag usage #26529

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

tklauser
Copy link
Member

Remove a superfluous "how" from ipam-multi-pool-pre-allocation flag usage documentation.

Remove a superfluous "how" from ipam-multi-pool-pre-allocation flag
usage documentation.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias@cilium.io>
@tklauser tklauser added area/daemon Impacts operation of the Cilium daemon. release-note/misc This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact. labels Jun 28, 2023
@tklauser tklauser requested a review from gandro June 28, 2023 11:38
@tklauser tklauser requested a review from a team as a code owner June 28, 2023 11:38
@tklauser
Copy link
Member Author

/test

Copy link
Member

@gandro gandro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. label Jun 28, 2023
@borkmann borkmann merged commit b98df85 into main Jun 28, 2023
66 checks passed
@borkmann borkmann deleted the pr/tklauser/multi-pool-pre-alloc-flag-doc branch June 28, 2023 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/daemon Impacts operation of the Cilium daemon. ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. release-note/misc This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants